PQS，TW商家，经过快一个月的时间，老板已经采购了新的硬件并架设好了官网。上次评测的时候VDS构架为Hyper-v，老板为了便于管理和接入WHMCS，Hinet产品已经全部换成了KVM，并且对出网骨干线路进行了带宽扩容，所以再次进行评测。
老板TG Teson T
频道：PQSnews
群组：MJJtw
本人也有购入该商家产品，总的来说在线率合格，老板办事效率很高，而且经常半夜都能找到人。。。
目前Hinet的600M Vds均有货，低库存。
套餐详情
TPMJJ02VDS
- vCPU：2
- 内存：2GB
- 硬盘：20GB SSD
- 流量：不限(合理使用)
- 带宽：600Mbps
- 架构：KVM
- 价格：￥398/月
- 订购链接
TPMJJ04VDS
测评详情
基本信息
带宽测试
出网骨干带宽扩容之后带宽提升和之前相比很明显！
基本信息
本次测评所用机器为 TPMJJ06VDS ，感谢商家提供测试机。
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz Number of cores : 8 CPU frequency : 2892.748 MHz Total size of Disk : 115.0 GB (1.7 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 3948 MB (491 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 4095 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 20 hour 5 min Load average : 0.16, 0.11, 0.05 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.11.8-041108-generic ipaddr : 中国 台湾 新北市 cht.com.tw vm : kvm
硬盘速度
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 53 us / 94 us / 2.72 ms / 58 us
ioping: sequential speed
18.0 k requests completed in 5.00 s, 4.00 k iops, 999.5 MiB/s
Unixbench
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: host73.vds.pqs.pw: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.11.8-041108-generic -- #201706290836 SMP Thu Jun 29 12:38:45 UTC 2017
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
11:55:36 up 20:25, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.03; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jan 27 2019 11:55:36 - 12:23:42
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 31517332.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3784.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4435.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1009177.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 290727.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2210699.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2040351.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 88523.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6302.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9078.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3362.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3672653.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31517332.7 2700.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3784.8 688.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4435.1 1031.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1009177.7 2548.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 290727.2 1756.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2210699.7 3811.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2040351.0 1640.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 88523.3 221.3
Process Creation 126.0 6302.5 500.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9078.3 2141.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3362.0 5603.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3672653.5 2448.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1537.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jan 27 2019 12:23:42 - 12:52:03
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 192362618.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 27656.9 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 24309.8 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 800227.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 214309.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2362649.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 12551686.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1381876.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 33809.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 35203.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5557.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 7434973.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 192362618.4 16483.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 27656.9 5028.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 24309.8 5653.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 800227.3 2020.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 214309.8 1294.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2362649.4 4073.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12551686.8 10089.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1381876.4 3454.7
Process Creation 126.0 33809.9 2683.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 35203.0 8302.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5557.1 9261.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 7434973.9 4956.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 4870.2
海外速度
Node Name: IPv4 address: Download Speed CacheFly: 205.234.175.175: 12.12 MiB/s | 96.99 Mbps Linode, Tokyo, JP: 106.187.96.148: 34.75 MiB/s | 278.03 Mbps Linode, Tokyo2, JP: 139.162.65.37: 13.62 MiB/s | 109.00 Mbps Linode, Singapore, SG: 139.162.23.4: 10.35 MiB/s | 82.79 Mbps Linode, Fremont, CA: 50.116.14.9: 6.50 MiB/s | 51.99 Mbps Linode, Newark, NJ: 50.116.57.237: 4.76 MiB/s | 38.10 Mbps Linode, London, UK: 176.58.107.39: 3.06 MiB/s | 24.47 Mbps Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 139.162.130.8: 3.14 MiB/s | 25.08 Mbps Softlayer, Tokyo, JP: 161.202.125.20: 12.66 MiB/s | 101.29 Mbps Softlayer, Singapore, SG: 119.81.28.170: 33.68 MiB/s | 269.46 Mbps Softlayer, Seoul, KR: 119.81.28.170: 33.27 MiB/s | 266.17 Mbps Softlayer, HongKong, CN: 119.81.130.170: 63.52 MiB/s | 508.19 Mbps Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 169.48.124.82: 3.76 MiB/s | 30.07 Mbps Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 67.228.112.250: 12.20 MiB/s | 97.58 Mbps Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE: 159.122.69.4: 3.44 MiB/s | 27.55 Mbps Softlayer, Paris, FR: 159.8.64.212: 7.42 MiB/s | 59.34 Mbps Leaseweb, HongKong, CN: 43.249.36.49: 17.69 MiB/s | 141.55 Mbps Leaseweb, Singapore, SG: 103.254.153.18: 23.10 MiB/s | 184.81 Mbps Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US: 207.244.94.80: 3.57 MiB/s | 28.54 Mbps Leaseweb, San Francisco, US: 209.58.135.187: 5.12 MiB/s | 40.99 Mbps Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL: 5.79.108.33: 4.65 MiB/s | 37.23 Mbps OVH, Montreal, CA: 192.99.19.165: 4.84 MiB/s | 38.73 Mbps Hinet, Taiwan, TW: 210.61.132.1: 92.06 MiB/s | 736.46 Mbps
国内速度
安徽合肥电信: 61.191.111.11: 3.73 MiB/s | 29.85 Mbps 江苏南京电信: 202.102.23.133: 1.26 MiB/s | 10.10 Mbps 江西南昌电信: 182.98.238.226: 1.14 MiB/s | 9.13 Mbps 新疆昌吉电信: 61.128.107.242: 1.98 MiB/s | 15.82 Mbps 安徽合肥联通: 112.122.10.26: 624.47 KiB/s | 4.88 Mbps 山东济南联通: 221.214.108.58: 9.83 MiB/s | 78.63 Mbps 吉林长春联通: 221.9.246.35: 4.11 MiB/s | 32.89 Mbps 湖北武汉联通: 113.57.249.2: 34.63 MiB/s | 277.01 Mbps 西藏拉萨联通: 221.13.70.244: 12.17 MiB/s | 97.35 Mbps 辽宁沈阳联通: 175.167.135.234: 0 B/s | N/A 山西太原联通: 218.26.109.107: 25.58 MiB/s | 204.67 Mbps 江苏南京联通: 153.37.96.226: 6.35 MiB/s | 50.82 Mbps 安徽合肥移动: 120.209.140.60: 0 B/s | N/A 山西太原移动: 183.203.24.210: 0.96 MiB/s | 7.69 Mbps 四川成都移动: 183.221.247.9: 161.94 KiB/s | 1.27 Mbps 新疆昌吉移动: 117.190.59.82: 157.46 KiB/s | 1.23 Mbps 吉林长春移动: 111.26.139.78: 867.55 KiB/s | 6.78 Mbps 西藏拉萨移动: 211.139.74.234: 261.60 KiB/s | 2.04 Mbps 辽宁沈阳移动: 221.180.176.102: 856.73 KiB/s | 6.69 Mbps 湖北武汉移动: 111.48.26.136: 508.72 KiB/s | 3.97 Mbps 四川成都教育网: 202.115.1.138: 0.98 MiB/s | 7.80 Mbps
回程路由
===== 测试 [安徽合肥电信] 的回程路由 ===== traceroute to speedtest1.ah163.com (61.191.111.11), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.88.89.254 0.24 ms http: error http: error 2 h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254) 3.25 ms 3 pcpc-3302.hinet.net (168.95.75.50) 2.30 ms 4 tpdt-3022.hinet.net (220.128.4.10) 2.26 ms 5 tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.27.5) 4.81 ms 6 r4105-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.12.201) 1.55 ms 9 * 10 202.97.94.125 34.08 ms 11 202.97.82.81 57.49 ms 12 202.97.59.130 65.73 ms 13 * 14 * 15 61.190.246.6 67.44 ms 16 61.191.111.11 66.40 ms ===== 回程 [安徽合肥电信] 路由测试结束 ===== ===== 测试 [江苏南京电信] 的回程路由 ===== traceroute to 4gnanjing1.speedtest.jsinfo.net (202.102.23.133), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.88.89.254 0.24 ms http: error http: error 2 h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254) 1.03 ms 4 tpdt-3022.hinet.net (220.128.4.10) 1.32 ms 3 pcpc-3302.hinet.net (168.95.75.50) 6.44 ms 6 r4106-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.11.177) 1.66 ms 7 r4006-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.10.201) 2.02 ms 8 202.97.4.73 24.47 ms 9 202.97.94.89 23.10 ms 10 202.97.94.125 28.63 ms 11 202.97.64.122 25.56 ms 12 202.97.65.149 54.62 ms 13 202.102.36.122 54.15 ms 14 202.102.23.30 53.24 ms 15 202.102.23.133 54.03 ms ===== 回程 [江苏南京电信] 路由测试结束 ===== ===== 测试 [江西南昌电信] 的回程路由 ===== traceroute to swxwyzx.f3322.net (182.98.238.226), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.88.89.254 0.22 ms http: error http: error 2 h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254) 1.51 ms 5 tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.25.181) 5.18 ms 6 r4106-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.11.181) 2.04 ms 7 r4006-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.10.201) 2.48 ms 8 202.97.51.49 36.75 ms 9 202.97.90.54 69.40 ms 10 202.97.57.154 51.18 ms 11 202.97.75.138 54.16 ms 12 182.98.241.210 50.02 ms 13 182.98.238.225 56.31 ms 14 182.98.238.226 43.42 ms ===== 回程 [江西南昌电信] 路由测试结束 ===== ===== 测试 [新疆昌吉电信] 的回程路由 ===== traceroute to 61.128.107.242 (61.128.107.242), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.88.89.254 0.22 ms http: error http: error 2 h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254) 1.15 ms 3 pcpc-3301.hinet.net (168.95.74.78) 16.01 ms 4 tpdb-3021.hinet.net (220.128.3.10) 2.16 ms 7 r4006-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.6.173) 1.99 ms 8 202.97.4.21 34.47 ms 9 202.97.61.78 34.87 ms 10 202.97.34.53 33.68 ms 11 202.97.57.158 40.25 ms 12 202.97.33.206 54.73 ms 13 202.97.24.50 96.82 ms 14 222.83.20.253 95.96 ms 15 222.83.20.146 97.04 ms 16 * 17 61.128.107.242 92.12 ms ===== 回程 [新疆昌吉电信] 路由测试结束 ===== ===== 测试 [安徽合肥联通] 的回程路由 ===== traceroute to 112.122.10.26 (112.122.10.26), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.88.89.254 0.27 ms 2 h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254) 1.12 ms 3 pcpc-3302.hinet.net (168.95.75.50) 1.11 ms 4 tpdt-3022.hinet.net (220.128.4.10) 2.39 ms 5 tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.25.89) 5.34 ms 6 r4105-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.12.201) 1.92 ms 7 r4005-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.10.193) 5.49 ms 8 219.158.34.157 26.97 ms 9 219.158.24.133 25.31 ms 10 219.158.24.125 26.43 ms 11 219.158.8.162 44.26 ms 12 * 13 58.242.193.74 52.94 ms 14 58.242.193.134 61.96 ms 17 112.122.10.26 45.42 ms ===== 回程 [安徽合肥联通] 路由测试结束 ===== ===== 测试 [山东济南联通] 的回程路由 ===== traceroute to speedtest.jnltwy.com (221.214.108.58), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.88.89.254 0.24 ms http: error http: error 2 h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254) 1.59 ms 6 r4106-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.11.181) 1.63 ms 5 tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.25.181) 4.23 ms 9 219.158.113.142 34.59 ms 10 * 11 219.158.23.42 44.45 ms 12 119.164.53.30 51.87 ms 13 221.0.5.174 55.50 ms 16 221.214.108.58 53.28 ms ===== 回程 [山东济南联通] 路由测试结束 ===== ===== 测试 [湖北武汉联通] 的回程路由 ===== traceroute to 113.57.249.2 (113.57.249.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.88.89.254 0.22 ms 2 h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254) 1.34 ms 3 pcpc-3301.hinet.net (168.95.74.50) 1.35 ms 4 tpdb-3021.hinet.net (220.128.3.10) 1.60 ms 5 tpdt-3011.hinet.net (220.128.24.181) 1.86 ms 6 r4105-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.12.125) 16.31 ms 9 219.158.103.29 31.01 ms 10 219.158.8.117 27.79 ms 11 219.158.8.162 45.57 ms 12 58.19.109.254 39.67 ms 13 218.104.110.18 41.09 ms 14 113.57.249.2 40.57 ms ===== 回程 [湖北武汉联通] 路由测试结束 =====
国内延迟
【安徽合肥电信】 - speedtest1.ah163.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 66.661/66.959/67.328/0.373 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【江苏南京电信】 - 4gnanjing1.speedtest.jsinfo.net 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9429ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 68.847/79.315/91.093/6.290 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【江西南昌电信】 - swxwyzx.f3322.net 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 60.077/60.608/61.842/0.591 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【新疆昌吉电信】 - 61.128.107.242 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 105.160/105.689/108.105/0.941 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【安徽合肥联通】 - 112.122.10.26 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.584/39.986/40.808/0.453 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【山东济南联通】 - speedtest.jnltwy.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.654/32.158/32.932/0.381 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【湖北武汉联通】 - 113.57.249.2 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.393/37.933/38.785/0.470 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【西藏拉萨联通】 - 221.13.70.244 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.564/86.378/90.342/1.357 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【辽宁沈阳联通】 - speedtest1.online.ln.cn 10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9206ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【山西太原联通】 - speedtest.sxunicomjzjk.cn 10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9212ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【江苏南京联通】 - speedtest02.js165.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.406/35.758/36.483/0.303 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【安徽合肥移动】 - 4gtest.ahydnet.com 10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9210ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【山西太原移动】 - sp.sx.chinamobile.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.142/79.343/81.647/3.512 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【四川成都移动】 - 183.221.247.9 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9032ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.615/713.308/1658.822/535.986 ms, pipe 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【新疆昌吉移动】 - speedtest5.xj.chinamobile.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 125.596/134.402/142.034/4.840 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【吉林长春移动】 - speedtest2.jl.chinamobile.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 83.653/92.506/100.508/4.730 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【西藏拉萨移动】 - speedtest1.xz.chinamobile.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 124.647/130.439/136.347/3.676 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【辽宁沈阳移动】 - speedtest1.ln.chinamobile.com 10 packets transmitted, 0 received, +10 errors, 100% packet loss, time 9131ms pipe 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【湖北武汉移动】 - speedtest1.hb.chinamobile.com 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 67.279/67.723/68.777/0.479 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 【四川成都教育网】 - sp1.uestc.edu.cn 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 202.050/202.565/204.176/0.792 ms
简评：VDS性能很不错，带宽充足。不过Hinet动态不同IP段到国内的表现不太一样，所以可以尽量换到出口走上海的IP段使用。
夜河资源网提供的所有内容仅供学习与交流。通过使用本站内容随之而来的风险以及法律责任与本站无关，所承担的法律责任由使用者承担。
一、如果您发现本站侵害了相关版权，请附上本站侵权链接和您的版权证明一并发送至邮箱：yehes#qq.com（#替换为@）我们将会在五天内处理并断开该文章下载地址。
二、本站所有资源来自互联网整理收集，全部内容采用撰写共用版权协议，要求署名、非商业用途和相同方式共享，如转载请也遵循撰写共用协议。
三、根据署名-非商业性使用-相同方式共享 (by-nc-sa) 许可协议规定，只要他人在以原作品为基础创作的新作品上适用同一类型的许可协议，并且在新作品发布的显著位置，注明原作者的姓名、来源及其采用的知识共享协议，与该作品在本网站的原发地址建立链接，他人就可基于非商业目的对原作品重新编排、修改、节选或者本人的作品为基础进行创作和发布。
四、基于原作品创作的所有新作品都要适用同一类型的许可协议，因此适用该项协议， 对任何以他人原作为基础创作的作品自然同样都不得商业性用途。
五、根据二〇〇二年一月一日《计算机软件保护条例》规定：为了学习和研究软件内含的设计思想和原理，通过安装、显示、传输或者存储软件等方式使用软件的，可不经软件著作权人许可，无需向其支付报酬！
六、鉴此，也望大家按此说明转载和分享资源！本站提供的所有信息、教程、软件版权归原公司所有，仅供日常使用，不得用于任何商业用途，下载试用后请24小时内删除，因下载本站资源造成的损失，全部由使用者本人承担！
一、如果您发现本站侵害了相关版权，请附上本站侵权链接和您的版权证明一并发送至邮箱：yehes#qq.com（#替换为@）我们将会在五天内处理并断开该文章下载地址。
二、本站所有资源来自互联网整理收集，全部内容采用撰写共用版权协议，要求署名、非商业用途和相同方式共享，如转载请也遵循撰写共用协议。
三、根据署名-非商业性使用-相同方式共享 (by-nc-sa) 许可协议规定，只要他人在以原作品为基础创作的新作品上适用同一类型的许可协议，并且在新作品发布的显著位置，注明原作者的姓名、来源及其采用的知识共享协议，与该作品在本网站的原发地址建立链接，他人就可基于非商业目的对原作品重新编排、修改、节选或者本人的作品为基础进行创作和发布。
四、基于原作品创作的所有新作品都要适用同一类型的许可协议，因此适用该项协议， 对任何以他人原作为基础创作的作品自然同样都不得商业性用途。
五、根据二〇〇二年一月一日《计算机软件保护条例》规定：为了学习和研究软件内含的设计思想和原理，通过安装、显示、传输或者存储软件等方式使用软件的，可不经软件著作权人许可，无需向其支付报酬！
六、鉴此，也望大家按此说明转载和分享资源！本站提供的所有信息、教程、软件版权归原公司所有，仅供日常使用，不得用于任何商业用途，下载试用后请24小时内删除，因下载本站资源造成的损失，全部由使用者本人承担！
